A4-4355M vs Pentium P6300

A4-4355M vs Pentium P6300 Performance Spectrum

A4-4355M

2 / 2

1,690

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium P6300

2 / 2

1,685

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4355M vs Pentium P6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4355M vs Pentium P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4355M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7400G, while Pentium P6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,685 vs 1,690).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A4-4355M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-4355M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4355M better than Pentium P6300?

Yes. A4-4355M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-4355M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-4355M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4355M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-4355M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4355M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-4355M vs Pentium P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4355M

The A4-4355M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,690 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-4355M and Pentium P6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A4-4355M versus 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 — a 159.6% clock advantage for the A4-4355M (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The A4-4355M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium P6300 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4355M scores 1,690 against the Pentium P6300's 1,685 — a 0.3% lead for the A4-4355M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4355M vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6300.

Feature	A4-4355M	Pentium P6300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+789%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.27 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,690	1,685
Geekbench 6 Single	239	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4355M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6300 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-4355M	Pentium P6300
Socket	FP2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4355M) / not specified (Pentium P6300). The A4-4355M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7400G), while the Pentium P6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4355M targets Ultrathin Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4355M rivals Pentium 2117U.