A4-5050 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

A4-5050 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Performance Spectrum

A4-5050

4 / 4

1,328

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5050 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5050 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5050

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8330, while Athlon Neo X2 L335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,328 vs 1,331).

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A4-5050 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5050 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L335 better than A4-5050?

Yes. Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-5050 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-5050 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5050

The A4-5050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5050 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-5050 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the A4-5050 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Athlon Neo X2 L335. The A4-5050 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5050 scores 1,328 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	A4-5050	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,328	1,331
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5050 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-5050 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — the A4-5050 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-5050 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5050) vs 2 (Athlon Neo X2 L335). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5050) vs 0 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) — the A4-5050 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-5050	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Socket	FT3	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5050) / not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L335). The A4-5050 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8330), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5050 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5050 rivals Pentium N3530.