A4-5050 vs Atom x7-Z8700

A4-5050 vs Atom x7-Z8700 Performance Spectrum

A4-5050

4 / 4

1,328

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x7-Z8700

4 / 4

1,325

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5050 vs Atom x7-Z8700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5050 vs Atom x7-Z8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5050

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 2) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Atom x7-Z8700

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,325 vs 1,328).

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5050 better than Atom x7-Z8700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x7-Z8700 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-5050 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5050 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5050 still makes the most sense overall. A4-5050 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-5050 vs Atom x7-Z8700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5050

The A4-5050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.

Atom x7-Z8700

The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-5050 and Atom x7-Z8700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the A4-5050 versus 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8700. The A4-5050 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x7-Z8700 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5050 scores 1,328 against the Atom x7-Z8700's 1,325 — a 0.2% lead for the A4-5050. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-5050	Atom x7-Z8700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.4 GHz+60%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,328	1,325
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5050 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x7-Z8700 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The A4-5050 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5050) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8700). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5050) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8700) — the A4-5050 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-5050	Atom x7-Z8700
Socket	FT3	UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+300%	2

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5050) / not specified (Atom x7-Z8700). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8330 (A4-5050) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5050 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5050 rivals Pentium N3530.