A4-6300B vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

A4-6300B vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Performance Spectrum

A4-6300B

2 / 2

1,328

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6300B vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6300B vs Athlon Neo X2 L335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6300B

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8370D, while Athlon Neo X2 L335 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,328 vs 1,331).

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A4-6300B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-6300B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-6300B.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-6300B better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-6300B is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-6300B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-6300B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo X2 L335 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6300B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-6300B vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6300B

The A4-6300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-6300B and Athlon Neo X2 L335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300B versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — a 83.6% clock advantage for the A4-6300B. The A4-6300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6300B scores 1,328 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	A4-6300B	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+144%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,328	1,331
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-6300B versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — the A4-6300B supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6300B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-6300B) vs 0 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) — the A4-6300B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-6300B) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335).

Feature	A4-6300B	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Socket	FM2	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6300B) / not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L335). The A4-6300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300B rivals Pentium G3240.