A4-6300B
VS
Core 2 Duo U7700

A4-6300B vs Core 2 Duo U7700

AMD

A4-6300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo U7700

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-6300B is positioned at rank 745 and the Core 2 Duo U7700 is on rank 1203, so the A4-6300B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14086%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13310%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9664%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2911%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2306%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2017%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1155%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1140%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1038%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1038%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1027%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
999%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
985%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
981%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
972%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#745
A4-6300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
100%
#748
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
100%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
100%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
99%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
99%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
98%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
98%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
98%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
98%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
98%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
98%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7700

#1190
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5753%
#1191
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5669%
#1192
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5204%
#1193
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5180%
#1194
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5133%
#1196
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4957%
#1197
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4753%
#1198
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4745%
#1199
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4618%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
100%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
99%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
99%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
96%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
93%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
93%
#1212
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
91%
#1215
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
90%
#1216
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
90%
#1217
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-6300B (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA4-6300BCore 2 Duo U7700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo U7700 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA4-6300BCore 2 Duo U7700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-6300B and Core 2 Duo U7700

AMD

A4-6300B

The A4-6300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7700

The Core 2 Duo U7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,335 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A4-6300B and Core 2 Duo U7700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300B versus 1.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7700 — a 98.3% clock advantage for the A4-6300B (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The A4-6300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7700 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6300B scores 1,328 against the Core 2 Duo U7700's 1,335 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7700.

FeatureA4-6300BCore 2 Duo U7700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+193%
1.33 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+178%
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
2 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,328
1,335
Geekbench 6 Single
415
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo U7700 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-6300BCore 2 Duo U7700
Socket
FM2
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6300B) / not specified (Core 2 Duo U7700). The A4-6300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Core 2 Duo U7700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300B rivals Pentium G3240.

FeatureA4-6300BCore 2 Duo U7700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8370D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop