A4-6300B vs Core i5-460M

A4-6300B vs Core i5-460M Performance Spectrum

A4-6300B

2 / 2

1,328

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-460M

2 / 4

1,321

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6300B vs Core i5-460M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6300B vs Core i5-460M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6300B

2013

Why buy it

✅+21% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-460M.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i5-460M

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (343 vs 415).
❌Lower PassMark (1,321 vs 1,328).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A4-6300B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-6300B.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-6300B better than Core i5-460M?

Yes. A4-6300B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-6300B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-6300B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-6300B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-6300B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-460M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6300B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-6300B vs Core i5-460M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6300B

The A4-6300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-460M

The Core i5-460M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,321 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-6300B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-460M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300B versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-460M — a 32.8% clock advantage for the A4-6300B (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The A4-6300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-460M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6300B scores 1,328 against the Core i5-460M's 1,321 — a 0.5% lead for the A4-6300B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 415 vs 343, a 19% lead for the A4-6300B that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-6300B	Core i5-460M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+39%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+46%	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,328	1,321
Geekbench 6 Single	415+21%	343

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-460M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-6300B versus 1066 on the Core i5-460M — the A4-6300B supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6300B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-6300B) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-460M).

Feature	A4-6300B	Core i5-460M
Socket	FM2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6300B) vs true (Core i5-460M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8370D (A4-6300B) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-460M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300B rivals Pentium G3240; Core i5-460M rivals AMD Turion II M620.