A4-9120C vs Celeron N3060

A4-9120C vs Celeron N3060 Performance Spectrum

A4-9120C

2 / 2

1,258

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3060

2 / 2

1,267

+0.7%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-9120C vs Celeron N3060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-9120C vs Celeron N3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-9120C

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,258 vs 1,267).

Celeron N3060

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while A4-9120C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3060 better than A4-9120C?

Yes. Celeron N3060 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3060 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3060 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3060 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3060 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-9120C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-9120C vs Celeron N3060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-9120C

The A4-9120C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N3060

The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-9120C and Celeron N3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the A4-9120C versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 — a 43.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3060. The A4-9120C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N3060 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-9120C scores 1,258 against the Celeron N3060's 1,267 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N3060.

Feature	A4-9120C	Celeron N3060
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.48 GHz+55%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,258	1,267
Geekbench 6 Single	418	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-9120C uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A4-9120C versus 1600 on the Celeron N3060 — the A4-9120C supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-9120C) vs 2 (Celeron N3060). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-9120C) vs 4 (Celeron N3060) — the A4-9120C offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-9120C	Celeron N3060
Socket	BGA	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+17%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-9120C) vs true (Celeron N3060). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 (A4-9120C) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3060) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-9120C targets Chromebook. Direct competitor: A4-9120C rivals Celeron N3350; Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.