A4-9120C vs Pentium SU2700

A4-9120C vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

A4-9120C

2 / 2

1,258

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU2700

1 / 1

1,268

+0.8%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-9120C vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-9120C vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-9120C

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 10W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4, while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,258 vs 1,268).

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A4-9120C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 10W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-9120C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-9120C better than Pentium SU2700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-9120C is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-9120C is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A4-9120C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium SU2700 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-9120C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-9120C vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-9120C

The A4-9120C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-9120C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A4-9120C has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the A4-9120C versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the A4-9120C. The A4-9120C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-9120C scores 1,258 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium SU2700.

Feature	A4-9120C	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,258	1,268
Geekbench 6 Single	418	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-9120C uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-9120C	Pentium SU2700
Socket	BGA	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-9120C) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The A4-9120C includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-9120C targets Chromebook. Direct competitor: A4-9120C rivals Celeron N3350.