A4-9120C vs Core i5-12400F

A4-9120C vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum

A4-9120C

2 / 2

1,258

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

+1452.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-9120C vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-9120C vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-9120C

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,258 vs 19,532).
❌Older platform position on BGA with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +557.4% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA and DDR4.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A4-9120C.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while A4-9120C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-9120C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than A4-9120C?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 557.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1452.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 557.4% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1452.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $174 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 557.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A4-9120C vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-9120C

The A4-9120C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-9120C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the A4-9120C versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 93.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The A4-9120C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A4-9120C scores 1,258 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 175.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 418 vs 1,700, a 121.1% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-9120C	Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	4.4 GHz+175%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	28 nm	Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	1,258	19,532+1453%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,380
Geekbench 6 Single	418	1,700+307%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-9120C uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A4-9120C versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-9120C) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-9120C) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-9120C	Core i5-12400F
Socket	BGA	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-9120C) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A4-9120C includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-9120C targets Chromebook, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A4-9120C rivals Celeron N3350; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.