A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron G1620T

CPU

GPU

A4 PRO-7350B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G1620T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron G1620T Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-7350B

2 / 2

1,544

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1620T

2 / 2

1,532

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron G1620T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron G1620T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-7350B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G1620T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.9 vs 36.5 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Celeron G1620T

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.5 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4 PRO-7350B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,532 vs 1,544).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7350B.

Quick Answers

So, is A4 PRO-7350B better than Celeron G1620T?

Yes. A4 PRO-7350B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4 PRO-7350B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-7350B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4 PRO-7350B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4 PRO-7350B comes in 19.0% more expensive on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1620T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 18.1% better value on paper (36.5 vs 30.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-7350B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron G1620T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7350B

The A4 PRO-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,544 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G1620T

The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4 PRO-7350B and Celeron G1620T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A4 PRO-7350B versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T — a 45.2% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7350B (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4 PRO-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G1620T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7350B scores 1,544 against the Celeron G1620T's 1,532 — a 0.8% lead for the A4 PRO-7350B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 374, a 1.6% lead for the A4 PRO-7350B that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron G1620T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1024 kB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,544	1,532
Geekbench 6 Single	380+2%	374
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	701

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7350B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1620T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A4 PRO-7350B versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620T — the A4 PRO-7350B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1620T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A68H,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7350B) and H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1620T).

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron G1620T
Socket	FM2+	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7350B) vs VT-x (Celeron G1620T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A4 PRO-7350B) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1620T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7350B targets Business Desktop, Celeron G1620T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7350B rivals Pentium G3260; Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron G1620T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Business Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A4 PRO-7350B was priced at $50, while the Celeron G1620T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($50 vs $42), Celeron G1620T was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4 PRO-7350B delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 36.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G1620T — making the Celeron G1620T the 16.6% better value option.

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron G1620T
MSRP	$50	$42-16%
Performance per Dollar	30.9	36.5+18%
Release Date	2014	2013

Search A4 PRO-7350B on Amazon

Search Celeron G1620T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.