
A4 PRO-7350B

Core i3-2340UE
A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i3-2340UE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i3-2340UE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i3-2340UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4 PRO-7350B
2014Why buy it
- ✅+65.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 299.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-2340UE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,544 vs 1,545).
- ❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
Core i3-2340UE
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (230 vs 380).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7350B.
Quick Answers
So, is A4 PRO-7350B better than Core i3-2340UE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i3-2340UE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7350B
The A4 PRO-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,544 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2340UE
The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The A4 PRO-7350B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A4 PRO-7350B versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE — a 98% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7350B. The A4 PRO-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7350B scores 1,544 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-2340UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 230, a 49.2% lead for the A4 PRO-7350B that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4 PRO-7350B | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+192% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,544 | 1,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380+65% | 230 |
Memory & Platform
The A4 PRO-7350B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A4 PRO-7350B versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2340UE — the A4 PRO-7350B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A68H,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7350B) and HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE).
| Feature | A4 PRO-7350B | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+40% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7350B) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A4 PRO-7350B) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7350B targets Business Desktop, Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7350B rivals Pentium G3260; Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.
| Feature | A4 PRO-7350B | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Business Desktop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A4 PRO-7350B was priced at $50, while the Core i3-2340UE came in at $200. On launch pricing ($50 vs $200), A4 PRO-7350B was $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4 PRO-7350B delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-2340UE — making the A4 PRO-7350B the 120% better value option.
| Feature | A4 PRO-7350B | Core i3-2340UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-75% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.9+301% | 7.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















