A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron J4005

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron J4005 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-7350B

2 / 2

1,544

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron J4005

2 / 2

1,543

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron J4005 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron J4005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-7350B

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J4005.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (380 vs 450).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Celeron J4005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Celeron J4005

2017

Why buy it

✅+18.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,543 vs 1,544).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7350B.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4005 better than A4 PRO-7350B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J4005 is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-7350B pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-7350B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4005 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J4005 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. A4 PRO-7350B only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4005 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron J4005 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7350B

The A4 PRO-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,544 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J4005

The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4 PRO-7350B and Celeron J4005 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A4 PRO-7350B versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7350B (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4 PRO-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7350B scores 1,544 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 — a 0.1% lead for the A4 PRO-7350B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 450, a 16.9% lead for the Celeron J4005 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron J4005
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark	1,544	1,543
Geekbench 6 Single	380	450+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7350B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A4 PRO-7350B versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 — the Celeron J4005 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4 PRO-7350B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4 PRO-7350B) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) — the A4 PRO-7350B offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A68H,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7350B) and SoC (Celeron J4005).

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron J4005
Socket	FM2+	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2400+29%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7350B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A4 PRO-7350B) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7350B targets Business Desktop, Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7350B rivals Pentium G3260; Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.

Feature	A4 PRO-7350B	Celeron J4005
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5	Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Business Desktop	Entry Level Desktop