A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i7-9700K

AMD

A4 PRO-7350B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-7350B

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $335 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700K.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,544 vs 14,397).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +490.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 21.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 670% HIGHER MSRP
    $385 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7350B.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than A4 PRO-7350B?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 490.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 832.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 490.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 832.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 670.0% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 490.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.1% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 30.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4 PRO-7350B vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A4 PRO-7350B

The A4 PRO-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,544 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-7350B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A4 PRO-7350B versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A4 PRO-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7350B scores 1,544 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 161.3% lead for the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureA4 PRO-7350BCore i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+29%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,544
14,397+832%
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7350B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A4 PRO-7350B versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A68H,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7350B) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureA4 PRO-7350BCore i7-9700K
Socket
FM2+
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7350B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 (A4 PRO-7350B) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7350B targets Business Desktop, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7350B rivals Pentium G3260.

FeatureA4 PRO-7350BCore i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Business Desktop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A4 PRO-7350B was priced at $50, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($50 vs $385), A4 PRO-7350B was $335 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4 PRO-7350B delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 19.1% better value option.

FeatureA4 PRO-7350BCore i7-9700K
MSRP
$50-87%
$385
Performance per Dollar
30.9
37.4+21%
Release Date
2014
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.