A6-1450 vs Pentium 3560Y

A6-1450 vs Pentium 3560Y Performance Spectrum

A6-1450

4 / 4

1,062

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium 3560Y

2 / 2

1,055

0.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-1450 vs Pentium 3560Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-1450 vs Pentium 3560Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-1450

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 512W, a 504W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8250, while Pentium 3560Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 3560Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-1450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,062).
❌6300% higher power demand at 512W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-1450 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-1450 better than Pentium 3560Y?

Yes. A6-1450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-1450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-1450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-1450 still makes the most sense overall. A6-1450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-1450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-1450 vs Pentium 3560Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-1450

The A6-1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium 3560Y

The Pentium 3560Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-1450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 3560Y offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-1450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the A6-1450 versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 3560Y — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A6-1450 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A6-1450 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 3560Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-1450 scores 1,062 against the Pentium 3560Y's 1,055 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-1450. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-1450 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3560Y.

Feature	A6-1450	Pentium 3560Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz+17%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.2 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,062	1,055
Geekbench 6 Single	144	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-1450 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3560Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-1450	Pentium 3560Y
Socket	FT3	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-1450) / not specified (Pentium 3560Y). The A6-1450 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8250), while the Pentium 3560Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-1450 targets Low Power Tablet/Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-1450 rivals Atom Z3740.