A6-3430MX vs Pentium M 725

A6-3430MX vs Pentium M 725 Performance Spectrum

A6-3430MX

4 / 4

1,389

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 725

1 / 1

1,400

+0.8%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3430MX vs Pentium M 725 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3430MX vs Pentium M 725: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3430MX

2011

Why buy it

✅+69.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6520G, while Pentium M 725 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,389 vs 1,400).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 45W vs 21W.

Pentium M 725

2004

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 21W instead of 45W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (150 vs 254).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3430MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 725 better than A6-3430MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-3430MX is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 725 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 725 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 725 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 725 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-3430MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-3430MX vs Pentium M 725 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3430MX

The A6-3430MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,389 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium M 725

The Pentium M 725 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,400 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3430MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 725 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A6-3430MX has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3430MX versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 725 — a 40% clock advantage for the A6-3430MX (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-3430MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 725 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3430MX scores 1,389 against the Pentium M 725's 1,400 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium M 725. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 254 vs 150, a 51.5% lead for the A6-3430MX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-3430MX	Pentium M 725
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+50%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+6%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,389	1,400
Geekbench 6 Single	254+69%	150
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3430MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 725 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-3430MX versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 725 — the A6-3430MX supports -580.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3430MX supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6-3430MX) vs 1 (Pentium M 725). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3430MX) vs 0 (Pentium M 725) — the A6-3430MX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-3430MX	Pentium M 725
Socket	FS1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3430MX) vs None (Pentium M 725). The A6-3430MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Pentium M 725 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3430MX targets Budget Laptop, Pentium M 725 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3430MX rivals Core i3-2350M.