A6-3430MX vs Pentium N3710

A6-3430MX vs Pentium N3710 Performance Spectrum

A6-3430MX

4 / 4

1,389

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium N3710

4 / 4

1,386

0.0%

Celeron B820

Celeron P4505

Pentium 2127U

Pentium Dual Core T4300

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3430MX vs Pentium N3710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3430MX vs Pentium N3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3430MX

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6520G, while Pentium N3710 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Pentium N3710

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,386 vs 1,389).
❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while A6-3430MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3430MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3710 better than A6-3430MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium N3710 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-3430MX pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3430MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3710 is the better buy right now. Pentium N3710 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A6-3430MX is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-3430MX vs Pentium N3710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3430MX

The A6-3430MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,389 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium N3710

The Pentium N3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,386 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-3430MX and Pentium N3710 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3430MX versus 2.56 GHz on the Pentium N3710 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Pentium N3710 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-3430MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3710 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3430MX scores 1,389 against the Pentium N3710's 1,386 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-3430MX. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-3430MX	Pentium N3710
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.56 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+6%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,389	1,386
Geekbench 6 Single	254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3430MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3710 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-3430MX	Pentium N3710
Socket	FS1	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3430MX) / not specified (Pentium N3710). The A6-3430MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Pentium N3710 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3430MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3430MX rivals Core i3-2350M.