A6-5400B
VS
Core 2 Duo T8300

A6-5400B vs Core 2 Duo T8300

AMD

A6-5400B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T8300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5400B is positioned at rank 699 and the Core 2 Duo T8300 is on rank 710, so the A6-5400B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-5400B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12765%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12061%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8758%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2090%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1828%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1047%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1033%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
941%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
941%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
930%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
905%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
893%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
889%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
881%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#699
A6-5400B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
100%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8300

#698
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
997%
#699
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
982%
#700
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
901%
#701
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
897%
#702
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
889%
#704
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
859%
#705
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
823%
#706
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
822%
#707
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
800%
#710
Core 2 Duo T8300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#712
Core i7-10850H
MSRP: $395|Avg: N/A
100%
#718
Core i3-1315UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $250
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo T8300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A6-5400B in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA6-5400BCore 2 Duo T8300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-5400BCore 2 Duo T8300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-5400B and Core 2 Duo T8300

AMD

A6-5400B

The A6-5400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,465 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T8300

The Core 2 Duo T8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $241.

Processing Power

Both the A6-5400B and Core 2 Duo T8300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400B versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8300 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the A6-5400B (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A6-5400B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5400B scores 1,465 against the Core 2 Duo T8300's 1,472 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 450, a 16.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5400B vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8300.

FeatureA6-5400BCore 2 Duo T8300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+58%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+50%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB+200%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,465
1,472
Geekbench 6 Single
380
450+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5400B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-5400B versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T8300 — the A6-5400B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5400B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5400B) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T8300) — the A6-5400B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A6-5400B) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8300).

FeatureA6-5400BCore 2 Duo T8300
Socket
FM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5400B) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8300). The A6-5400B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7540D), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400B targets Business Desktop, Core 2 Duo T8300 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5400B rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureA6-5400BCore 2 Duo T8300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7540D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Business Desktop
Legacy Laptop