
A6-5400B

Core 2 Duo T8300
A6-5400B vs Core 2 Duo T8300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-5400B vs Core 2 Duo T8300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-5400B vs Core 2 Duo T8300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-5400B
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7540D, while Core 2 Duo T8300 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo T8300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (380 vs 450).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,465 vs 1,472).
- ❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Core 2 Duo T8300
2008Why buy it
- ✅+18.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5400B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-5400B.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo T8300 better than A6-5400B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-5400B vs Core 2 Duo T8300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5400B
The A6-5400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,465 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T8300
The Core 2 Duo T8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $241.
Processing Power
Both the A6-5400B and Core 2 Duo T8300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400B versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8300 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the A6-5400B (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A6-5400B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5400B scores 1,465 against the Core 2 Duo T8300's 1,472 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 450, a 16.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5400B vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8300.
| Feature | A6-5400B | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,465 | 1,472 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380 | 450+18% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 850 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-5400B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-5400B versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T8300 — the A6-5400B supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5400B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5400B) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T8300) — the A6-5400B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A6-5400B) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8300).
| Feature | A6-5400B | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+133% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5400B) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8300). The A6-5400B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7540D), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400B targets Business Desktop, Core 2 Duo T8300 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5400B rivals Pentium G2020.
| Feature | A6-5400B | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7540D | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Business Desktop | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















