A6-5400B
VS
Core i7-620LM

A6-5400B vs Core i7-620LM

AMD

A6-5400B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5400B is positioned at rank 699 and the Core i7-620LM is on rank 1208, so the A6-5400B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-5400B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12765%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12061%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8758%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2090%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1828%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1047%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1033%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
941%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
941%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
930%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
905%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
893%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
889%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
881%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#699
A6-5400B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
100%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620LM

#1196
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6012%
#1197
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5924%
#1198
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5439%
#1199
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5414%
#1200
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5364%
#1202
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5180%
#1203
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4967%
#1204
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4959%
#1205
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4826%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
100%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
95%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
85%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-620LM leads in gaming performance. However, the A6-5400B is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-5400BCore i7-620LM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-5400BCore i7-620LM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-5400B and Core i7-620LM

AMD

A6-5400B

The A6-5400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,465 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Processing Power

The A6-5400B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620LM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400B versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM — a 30.3% clock advantage for the A6-5400B (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-5400B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-620LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5400B scores 1,465 against the Core i7-620LM's 1,463 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-5400B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 450, a 16.9% lead for the Core i7-620LM that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5400B vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM.

FeatureA6-5400BCore i7-620LM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+36%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,465
1,463
Geekbench 6 Single
380
450+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi
900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5400B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-620LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The A6-5400B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A6-5400B) and QM57,HM55 (Core i7-620LM).

FeatureA6-5400BCore i7-620LM
Socket
FM2
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5400B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7540D (A6-5400B) and Intel HD Graphics (Core i7-620LM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400B targets Business Desktop, Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5400B rivals Pentium G2020; Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureA6-5400BCore i7-620LM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7540D
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Business Desktop
Budget