A6-6400K
VS
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

A6-6400K vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+

AMD

A6-6400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-6400K is positioned at rank 688 and the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is on rank 1082, so the A6-6400K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12379%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11697%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8493%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2559%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2027%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1773%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1015%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1002%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
913%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
912%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
902%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
878%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
866%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
862%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
854%
#688
A6-6400K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
99%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
98%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
97%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
96%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
87071%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
82274%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
59737%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
17996%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
14255%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
12470%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7142%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7049%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6418%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6418%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6346%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6175%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6089%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6064%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6009%
#1081
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
100%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
100%
#1083
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
99%
#1084
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
97%
#1085
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
96%
#1086
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
93%
#1087
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
92%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
92%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
92%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
91%
#1091
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
91%
#1092
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
90%
#1093
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
86%
#1094
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
84%
#1095
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
79%
#1096
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-6400K (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-6400KAthlon 64 X2 5200+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-6400KAthlon 64 X2 5200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-6400K and Athlon 64 X2 5200+

AMD

A6-6400K

The A6-6400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,511 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,505 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the A6-6400K and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400K versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ — a 41.2% clock advantage for the A6-6400K. The A6-6400K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6400K scores 1,511 against the Athlon 64 X2 5200+'s 1,505 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-6400K. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-6400KAthlon 64 X2 5200+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+52%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512K
Process
32 nm-64%
90 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,511
1,505
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-6400K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-6400K versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ — the A6-6400K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-6400K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-6400K) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5200+) — the A6-6400K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A6-6400K) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5200+).

FeatureA6-6400KAthlon 64 X2 5200+
Socket
FM2
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1866+93200%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
32
16 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-6400K) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5200+). The A6-6400K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-6400K rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureA6-6400KAthlon 64 X2 5200+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true