
A6-6400K

Athlon 64 X2 5200+
A6-6400K vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-6400K vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-6400K vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-6400K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 89W, a 24W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8470D, while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon 64 X2 5200+.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,505 vs 1,511).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $420 MSRP, while A6-6400K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌36.9% higher power demand at 89W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-6400K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-6400K.
Quick Answers
So, is A6-6400K better than Athlon 64 X2 5200+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-6400K vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-6400K
The A6-6400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,511 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon 64 X2 5200+
The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,505 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A6-6400K and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400K versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ — a 41.2% clock advantage for the A6-6400K. The A6-6400K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6400K scores 1,511 against the Athlon 64 X2 5200+'s 1,505 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-6400K. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-6400K | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+52% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+100% | 512K |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,511 | 1,505 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-6400K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-6400K versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ — the A6-6400K supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-6400K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-6400K) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5200+) — the A6-6400K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A6-6400K) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5200+).
| Feature | A6-6400K | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1866+133% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A6-6400K) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5200+). The A6-6400K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-6400K rivals Pentium G3258.
| Feature | A6-6400K | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8470D | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















