A6-6400K
VS
Atom N2600

A6-6400K vs Atom N2600

AMD

A6-6400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Atom N2600

2 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-6400K is positioned at rank 688 and the Atom N2600 is on rank 40, so the Atom N2600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12379%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11697%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8493%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2559%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2027%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1773%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1015%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1002%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
913%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
912%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
902%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
878%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
866%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
862%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
854%
#688
A6-6400K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
99%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
98%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
97%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
96%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N2600

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
93%
#28
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
192%
#29
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
189%
#30
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
174%
#31
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
173%
#32
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
171%
#34
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
165%
#35
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
159%
#36
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
158%
#37
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
154%
#40
Atom N2600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
98%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-6400K leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom N2600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-6400KAtom N2600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-6400KAtom N2600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-6400K and Atom N2600

AMD

A6-6400K

The A6-6400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,511 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Atom N2600

The Atom N2600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 3.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,528 points. Launch price was $47.

Processing Power

The A6-6400K packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N2600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400K versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom N2600 — a 87.7% clock advantage for the A6-6400K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-6400K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom N2600 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6400K scores 1,511 against the Atom N2600's 1,528 — a 1.1% lead for the Atom N2600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-6400KAtom N2600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+156%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+144%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,511
1,528+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-6400K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom N2600 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-6400K versus DDR3-800 on the Atom N2600 — the A6-6400K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-6400K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 2 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6-6400K) vs 1 (Atom N2600). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-6400K) vs 4 (Atom N2600) — the A6-6400K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A6-6400K) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2600).

FeatureA6-6400KAtom N2600
Socket
FM2
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
32
2 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-6400K) / not specified (Atom N2600). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8470D (A6-6400K) and Intel GMA 3600 (Atom N2600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-6400K rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureA6-6400KAtom N2600
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Intel GMA 3600
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true