A6-7400K
VS
Core i7-2617M

A6-7400K vs Core i7-2617M

AMD

A6-7400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-2617M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7400K is positioned at rank 869 and the Core i7-2617M is on rank 287, so the Core i7-2617M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18767%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17733%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12875%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3879%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3072%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2688%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1539%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1519%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1383%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1383%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1368%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1331%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1312%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1307%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1295%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
100%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
100%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
100%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
100%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
99%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
99%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
98%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
98%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
97%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2617M

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
99%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#274
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
435%
#275
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
428%
#276
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
393%
#277
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
392%
#278
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
388%
#280
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
375%
#281
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
359%
#282
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
359%
#283
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
349%
#287
Core i7-2617M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-7400K leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2617M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-7400KCore i7-2617M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($43)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-7400KCore i7-2617M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($43)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-7400K and Core i7-2617M

AMD

A6-7400K

The A6-7400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,678 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core i7-2617M

The Core i7-2617M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,687 points. Launch price was $100.

Processing Power

The A6-7400K packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-2617M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6-7400K versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-2617M — a 40% clock advantage for the A6-7400K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A6-7400K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2617M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7400K scores 1,678 against the Core i7-2617M's 1,687 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2617M.

FeatureA6-7400KCore i7-2617M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+50%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+133%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,678
1,687
Geekbench 6 Single
448
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7400K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2617M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-7400K versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2617M — the A6-7400K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7400K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7400K) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2617M).

FeatureA6-7400KCore i7-2617M
Socket
FM2+
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32
8 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-7400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A6-7400K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2617M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7400K) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2617M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2617M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: A6-7400K rivals Pentium G3420; Core i7-2617M rivals A6-3400M.

FeatureA6-7400KCore i7-2617M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook