A6-7400K vs Pentium P6300

AMD

A6-7400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium P6300

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

A6-7400K vs Pentium P6300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7400K vs Pentium P6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7400K vs Pentium P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7400K

2014

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Pentium P6300 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium P6300.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,678 vs 1,685).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 21.1 PassMark/$ ($101 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $21 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while A6-7400K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-7400K.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium P6300 better than A6-7400K?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7400K is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium P6300 is the better buy right now. Pentium P6300 comes in $21 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $101 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-7400K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.8% better value on MSRP (21.1 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-7400K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7400K vs Pentium P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6-7400K

The A6-7400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,678 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the A6-7400K and Pentium P6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6-7400K versus 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 — a 174.1% clock advantage for the A6-7400K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The A6-7400K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium P6300 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7400K scores 1,678 against the Pentium P6300's 1,685 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium P6300.

FeatureA6-7400KPentium P6300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+1344%
0.27 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+54%
2.27 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,678
1,685
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7400K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6300 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA6-7400KPentium P6300
Socket
FM2+
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-7400K) / not specified (Pentium P6300). The A6-7400K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Pentium P6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7400K rivals Pentium G3420.

FeatureA6-7400KPentium P6300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-7400K was priced at $101, while the Pentium P6300 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($101 vs $80), Pentium P6300 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7400K delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 21.1 pts/$ for the Pentium P6300 — making the Pentium P6300 the 23.6% better value option.

FeatureA6-7400KPentium P6300
MSRP
$101
$80-21%
Performance per Dollar
16.6
21.1+27%
Release Date
2014
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.