A6-9210 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+

CPU

GPU

A6-9210

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2016

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

A6-9210

2 / 2

1,254

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

2 / 2

1,255

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9210 is positioned at rank 858 and the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is on rank 1101, so the A6-9210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9210

#846

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1404%

#847

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1383%

#848

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1270%

#849

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1264%

#850

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1253%

#852

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1210%

#853

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1160%

#854

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1158%

#855

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1127%

#858

A6-9210

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#863

Pentium Dual Core T2390

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

99%

#867

Core i7-1160G7

MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A

98%

#873

Celeron M 540

MSRP: $86|Avg: $20

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

144313%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

136361%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

99009%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

29827%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

23626%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

20669%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

11838%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

11683%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

10638%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

10637%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

10518%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

10234%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

10091%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

10050%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

9959%

#1101

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

MSRP: $581|Avg: $110

100%

#1102

Athlon 64 3500+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $10

97%

#1103

Pentium D 830

MSRP: $316|Avg: $20

91%

#1104

Pentium D 960

MSRP: $523|Avg: $15

89%

#1105

Athlon XP 2500+

MSRP: $172|Avg: $15

86%

#1106

Athlon 64 3800+

MSRP: $354|Avg: $10

85%

#1107

Pentium 4 2.53

MSRP: $193|Avg: $13

83%

#1108

Pentium 4 2.40

MSRP: $193|Avg: $193

78%

#1109

Athlon XP 2400+

MSRP: $193|Avg: $10

73%

#1110

Pentium D 950

MSRP: $637|Avg: $10

68%

#1111

Athlon XP 1500+

MSRP: $130|Avg: $15

67%

#1112

Athlon 64 4000+

MSRP: $482|Avg: $30

65%

#1113

Pentium 4 2.66

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

58%

#1114

Pentium 4 2.80

MSRP: $327|Avg: $25

58%

#1115

Athlon XP 1600+

MSRP: $160|Avg: $15

58%

#1116

Athlon 64 3400+

MSRP: $440|Avg: $20

57%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9210 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	A6-9210	Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	A6-9210	Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

A6-9210 Benchmark Check

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+

A6-9210

The A6-9210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,255 points. Launch price was $309.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-9210 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — a 24% clock advantage for the A6-9210. The A6-9210 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses Manchester (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9210 scores 1,254 against the Athlon 64 X2 4200+'s 1,255 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

Feature	A6-9210	Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+27%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-69%	90 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Manchester (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,254	1,255

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9210 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9210 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — the A6-9210 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9210) vs 2 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9210) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) — the A6-9210 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9210) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+).

Feature	A6-9210	Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Socket	FP4	939
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	8	0