A6-9210 vs Celeron N3060

A6-9210 vs Celeron N3060 Performance Spectrum

A6-9210

2 / 2

1,254

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3060

2 / 2

1,267

+1.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9210 vs Celeron N3060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9210 vs Celeron N3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9210

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,254 vs 1,267).
❌150% higher power demand at 15W vs 6W.

Celeron N3060

2016

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 15W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while A6-9210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3060 better than A6-9210?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9210 is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3060 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3060 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3060 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3060 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-9210 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9210 vs Celeron N3060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9210

The A6-9210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron N3060

The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9210 and Celeron N3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-9210 versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the A6-9210 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-9210 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N3060 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9210 scores 1,254 against the Celeron N3060's 1,267 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N3060.

Feature	A6-9210	Celeron N3060
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+13%	2.48 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+50%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	1 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,254	1,267+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9210 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9210 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3060 — the A6-9210 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9210 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9210) vs 2 (Celeron N3060). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9210) vs 4 (Celeron N3060) — the A6-9210 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9210) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3060).

Feature	A6-9210	Celeron N3060
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9210) / true (Celeron N3060). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9210) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3060) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.