A6-9400
VS
Celeron J4115

A6-9400 vs Celeron J4115

AMD

A6-9400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-9400 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J4115 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA6-9400Celeron J4115
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Gemini Lake (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-9400Celeron J4115
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9400 and Celeron J4115

AMD

A6-9400

The A6-9400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,717 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4115 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A6-9400 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 38.7% clock advantage for the A6-9400 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-9400 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9400 scores 2,717 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 1.1% lead for the A6-9400.

FeatureA6-9400Celeron J4115
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+48%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+89%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
4 MB+300%
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark
2,717+1%
2,688
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9400 versus 2400 on the Celeron J4115 — the Celeron J4115 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9400) vs 6 (Celeron J4115) — the A6-9400 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9400) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4115).

FeatureA6-9400Celeron J4115
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
2400+59900%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+838860700%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8+33%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9400) / true (Celeron J4115). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9400) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureA6-9400Celeron J4115
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true