A6-9400 vs Celeron J4115

A6-9400 vs Celeron J4115 Performance Spectrum

A6-9400

2 / 2

2,717

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron J4115

4 / 4

2,688

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9400 vs Celeron J4115 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9400 vs Celeron J4115: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9400

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-9400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,688 vs 2,717).

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9400 better than Celeron J4115?

Yes. A6-9400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-9400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-9400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9400 still makes the most sense overall. A6-9400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4115 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A6-9400 vs Celeron J4115 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9400

The A6-9400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,717 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4115 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A6-9400 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 38.7% clock advantage for the A6-9400 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-9400 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9400 scores 2,717 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 1.1% lead for the A6-9400.

Feature	A6-9400	Celeron J4115
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+48%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+89%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	4 MB+300%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark	2,717+1%	2,688

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The A6-9400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9400) vs 6 (Celeron J4115) — the A6-9400 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9400) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4115).

Feature	A6-9400	Celeron J4115
Socket	AM4	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+33%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9400) / true (Celeron J4115). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9400) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.