GeForce 9400 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
GeForce 9400
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9400 is positioned at rank 616 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is on rank 207, so the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 327.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9400.
| Insight | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-327.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+327.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $89 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 38.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($89) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9400 and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
GeForce 9400
The GeForce 9400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9400 scores 147 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 629 — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B leads by 327.9%. The GeForce 9400 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 147 | 629+328% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+5197% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 2920 MHz+148% |
| ROPs | 8 | 128+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 256+967% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400 draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce 9400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-89% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5+114% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9400 launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119 and now averages $89. The GeForce 9400 costs 83.1% less ($74 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.8 (GeForce 9400) vs 7.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the GeForce 9400 offers 38% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-50% | $119 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-83% | $89 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.8+38% | 7.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 48 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #847 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9400 and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
