GeForce 9400 vs GeForce GT 130M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9400 vs GeForce GT 130M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400 vs GeForce GT 130M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9400 vs GeForce GT 130M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 130M

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (147 vs 145), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9400 vs GeForce GT 130M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400

The GeForce 9400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400 scores 147 and the GeForce GT 130M reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 130M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400) vs 384 (GeForce GT 130M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
G3D Mark Score
147+1%
145
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock
1176 MHz
1468 MHz+25%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 130M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 130M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 130M) — the GeForce 9400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (GeForce 9400) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
DirectX
10
10.1
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9400) vs No (GeForce GT 130M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M).

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400 draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 130M's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400) vs 350W (GeForce GT 130M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
4.5
4.8+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 130M (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9400GeForce GT 130M
MSRP
$59
Codename
GM108
GP108
Release
March 13 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#847
#641

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.