GeForce 9400 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9400 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
18% HIGHER MSRP
$59 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (148 vs 147), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 4350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $59, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 18.8% (3.0 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9400 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9400 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9400

The GeForce 9400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400 scores 147 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4350). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4350).

Feature	GeForce 9400	Mobility Radeon HD 4350
G3D Mark Score	147	148
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+140%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9400	Mobility Radeon HD 4350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) — the GeForce 9400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9400	Mobility Radeon HD 4350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400 draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4350's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 9400	Mobility Radeon HD 4350
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	4.5+50%	3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9400 came in at $59, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 launched at $50. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4350 was 15.3% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 9400) vs 3.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 offers 20% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9400 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 9400	Mobility Radeon HD 4350
MSRP	$59	$50-15%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	3.0+20%
Codename	GM108	Broadway
Release	March 13 2015	January 7 2010
Ranking	#847	#846

Search GeForce 9400 on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon HD 4350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.