A6-9400
VS
Core m3-7Y32

A6-9400 vs Core m3-7Y32

AMD

A6-9400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core m3-7Y32

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y32

#1078
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3056%
#1079
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3011%
#1080
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2765%
#1081
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2752%
#1082
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2727%
#1084
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2633%
#1085
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2525%
#1086
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2521%
#1087
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2453%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-9400 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core m3-7Y32 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA6-9400Core m3-7Y32
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-9400Core m3-7Y32
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9400 and Core m3-7Y32

AMD

A6-9400

The A6-9400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,717 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The A6-9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-7Y32's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A6-9400 versus 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the A6-9400 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A6-9400 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9400 scores 2,717 against the Core m3-7Y32's 2,697 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-9400.

FeatureA6-9400Core m3-7Y32
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+23%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+209%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,717
2,697
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA6-9400Core m3-7Y32
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

The A6-9400 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureA6-9400Core m3-7Y32
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5