
A8-3500M

Ryzen 5 3600
A8-3500M vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-3500M vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-3500M vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-3500M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6620G, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,391 vs 17,685).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +492.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8-3500M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while A8-3500M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3500M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than A8-3500M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-3500M vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3500M
The A8-3500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,391 points. Launch price was $90.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The A8-3500M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-3500M versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A8-3500M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3500M scores 1,391 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 170.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 231 vs 1,295, a 139.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3500M vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | A8-3500M | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+75% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+140% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,391 | 17,685+1171% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 231 | 1,295+461% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-3500M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A8-3500M versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3500M) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A8-3500M | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3500M) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The A8-3500M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3500M targets Budget Laptop, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: A8-3500M rivals Core i3-2310M; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | A8-3500M | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6620G | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













