
A8-3850

Core i5-10400F
A8-3850 vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-3850 vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-3850 vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-3850
2011Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6550D, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,421 vs 13,029).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +210.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while A8-3850 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than A8-3850?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-3850 vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3850
The A8-3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,421 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The A8-3850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A8-3850 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8-3850 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3850 scores 2,421 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 137.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 363 vs 1,454, a 120.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3850 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | A8-3850 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz+48% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,421 | 13,029+438% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 363 | 1,454+301% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-3850 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3850 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3850) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the A8-3850 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A8-3850) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | A8-3850 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2666+43% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3850) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The A8-3850 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3850 targets Mainstream Desktop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A8-3850 rivals Core i3-2105; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | A8-3850 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6550D | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















