
A8-5500B
Popular choices:

Core i5-3330S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A8-5500B
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7560D, while Core i5-3330S needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-3330S.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-3330S
2012Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5500B across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,915 vs 3,967).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $231 MSRP, while A8-5500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5500B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
A8-5500B
2012Core i5-3330S
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7560D, while Core i5-3330S needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-3330S.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5500B across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,915 vs 3,967).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $231 MSRP, while A8-5500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5500B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-5500B better than Core i5-3330S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-5500B and Core i5-3330S

A8-5500B
A8-5500B
The A8-5500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,967 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-3330S
Core i5-3330S
The Core i5-3330S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,915 points. Launch price was $231.
Processing Power
Both the A8-5500B and Core i5-3330S share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500B versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3330S — a 14.5% clock advantage for the A8-5500B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A8-5500B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3330S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500B scores 3,967 against the Core i5-3330S's 3,915 — a 1.3% lead for the A8-5500B. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5500B vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3330S.
| Feature | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+19% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,967+1% | 3,915 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5500B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3330S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A8-5500B) / not specified (Core i5-3330S). The A8-5500B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7560D), while the Core i5-3330S requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5500B rivals Pentium G2120.
| Feature | A8-5500B | Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7560D | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













