A8-5500B vs Celeron N5105

A8-5500B vs Celeron N5105 Performance Spectrum

A8-5500B

4 / 4

3,967

0.0%

Athlon II X4 630

Athlon X4 740

Athlon X4 830

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen 7 6800H

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N5105

4 / 4

4,003

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5500B vs Celeron N5105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5500B vs Celeron N5105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5500B

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7560D, while Celeron N5105 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron N5105.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,967 vs 4,003).
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Celeron N5105

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5500B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5500B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-5500B.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5105 better than A8-5500B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-5500B is ahead with a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5105 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N5105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5500B vs Celeron N5105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5500B

The A8-5500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,967 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-5500B and Celeron N5105 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500B versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the A8-5500B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A8-5500B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N5105 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500B scores 3,967 against the Celeron N5105's 4,003 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5500B vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105.

Feature	A8-5500B	Celeron N5105
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+28%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1.5 MB (total)+50%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	3,967	4,003

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5500B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N5105 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-5500B	Celeron N5105
Socket	FM2	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-5500B) / not specified (Celeron N5105). The A8-5500B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7560D), while the Celeron N5105 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5500B rivals Pentium G2120.