A8-5500B
VS
Core i7-2720QM

A8-5500B vs Core i7-2720QM

AMD

A8-5500B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-2720QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5500B is positioned at rank 326 and the Core i7-2720QM is on rank 1062, so the A8-5500B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5500B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4714%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4455%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3234%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
974%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
772%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
675%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
387%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
382%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
348%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
347%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
344%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
334%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
330%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
328%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
325%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
100%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
100%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
100%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
98%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
97%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
97%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
97%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
97%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
96%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
95%
#326
A8-5500B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2720QM

#1050
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2763%
#1051
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2722%
#1052
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2499%
#1053
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2488%
#1054
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2465%
#1056
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2380%
#1057
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2282%
#1058
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2279%
#1059
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2218%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
99%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
98%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
97%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-5500B leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2720QM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-5500BCore i7-2720QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-5500BCore i7-2720QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-5500B and Core i7-2720QM

AMD

A8-5500B

The A8-5500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,967 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i7-2720QM

The Core i7-2720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,015 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The A8-5500B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2720QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500B versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-2720QM — a 11.4% clock advantage for the A8-5500B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A8-5500B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-2720QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500B scores 3,967 against the Core i7-2720QM's 4,015 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-2720QM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5500B vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2720QM.

FeatureA8-5500BCore i7-2720QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+12%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+45%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,967
4,015+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
700
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5500B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2720QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-5500B versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2720QM — the A8-5500B supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5500B supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-5500B) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i7-2720QM).

FeatureA8-5500BCore i7-2720QM
Socket
FM2
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64
32 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5500B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2720QM). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7560D (A8-5500B) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2720QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2720QM targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-5500B rivals Pentium G2120; Core i7-2720QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureA8-5500BCore i7-2720QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7560D
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Performance Laptop