
A8-5500B
Popular choices:

Core i7-2675QM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A8-5500B
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-2675QM.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i7-2675QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5500B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,967).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while A8-5500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-5500B.
A8-5500B
2012Core i7-2675QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-2675QM.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5500B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,967).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while A8-5500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-5500B.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-5500B better than Core i7-2675QM?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-5500B and Core i7-2675QM

A8-5500B
A8-5500B
The A8-5500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,967 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The A8-5500B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2675QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A8-5500B versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 17.6% clock advantage for the A8-5500B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A8-5500B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-2675QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5500B scores 3,967 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 1.4% lead for the A8-5500B. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5500B vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM.
| Feature | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+19% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+45% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,967+1% | 3,913 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5500B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-5500B versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2675QM — the A8-5500B supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5500B supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FCBGA1224 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1866+62100% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 16 GB+26214300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5500B) vs VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7560D (A8-5500B) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2675QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-5500B rivals Pentium G2120.
| Feature | A8-5500B | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7560D | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













