CPU
GPU
A8-5550M
Core 2 Duo T9500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5550M is positioned at rank 692 and the Core 2 Duo T9500 is on rank 343, so the Core 2 Duo T9500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-5550M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-5550M and Core 2 Duo T9500
A8-5550M
The A8-5550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,811 points. Launch price was $90.
Core 2 Duo T9500
The Core 2 Duo T9500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $530.
Processing Power
The A8-5550M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5550M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5550M versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — a 17.5% clock advantage for the A8-5550M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A8-5550M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5550M scores 1,811 against the Core 2 Duo T9500's 1,799 — a 0.7% lead for the A8-5550M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5550M vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9500.
| Feature | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+19% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,811 | 1,799 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5550M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5550M versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — the A8-5550M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5550M) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9500).
| Feature | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1r2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5550M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9500). The A8-5550M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-5550M rivals Core i3-4000M; Core 2 Duo T9500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-5550M and Core 2 Duo T9500
