A8-7200P vs Athlon II X4 630

A8-7200P vs Athlon II X4 630 Performance Spectrum

A8-7200P

4 / 4

2,158

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X4 630

4 / 4

2,175

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7200P vs Athlon II X4 630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7200P vs Athlon II X4 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7200P

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Athlon II X4 630 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,158 vs 2,175).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8-7200P.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while A8-7200P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7200P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7200P better than Athlon II X4 630?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7200P is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7200P is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-7200P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X4 630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7200P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7200P vs Athlon II X4 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7200P

The A8-7200P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $90.

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-7200P and Athlon II X4 630 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A8-7200P versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the A8-7200P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A8-7200P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7200P scores 2,158 against the Athlon II X4 630's 2,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Athlon II X4 630.

Feature	A8-7200P	Athlon II X4 630
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+18%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,158	2,175

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7200P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-7200P versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 — the A8-7200P supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A8-7200P) and Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630).

Feature	A8-7200P	Athlon II X4 630
Socket	FP3	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A8-7200P) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630). The A8-7200P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7200P rivals Core i3-4100M.