A8-7200P vs Core i5-3437U

A8-7200P vs Core i5-3437U Performance Spectrum

A8-7200P

4 / 4

2,158

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3437U

2 / 4

2,166

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7200P vs Core i5-3437U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7200P vs Core i5-3437U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7200P

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,158 vs 2,166).

Core i5-3437U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7200P better than Core i5-3437U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7200P is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3437U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3437U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7200P still makes the most sense overall. A8-7200P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7200P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7200P vs Core i5-3437U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7200P

The A8-7200P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-3437U

The Core i5-3437U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,166 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7200P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3437U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7200P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A8-7200P versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-3437U — a 12.9% clock advantage for the A8-7200P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A8-7200P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-3437U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7200P scores 2,158 against the Core i5-3437U's 2,166 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-3437U.

Feature	A8-7200P	Core i5-3437U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+26%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,158	2,166
Geekbench 6 Single	—	440
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,080

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7200P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3437U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-7200P versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3437U — the A8-7200P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3437U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A8-7200P) and QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3437U).

Feature	A8-7200P	Core i5-3437U
Socket	FP3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7200P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3437U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A8-7200P) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3437U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3437U targets Business Ultrabook. Direct competitor: A8-7200P rivals Core i3-4100M; Core i5-3437U rivals AMD A8-4555M.

Feature	A8-7200P	Core i5-3437U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Business Ultrabook