A8-7200P vs Core 2 Duo SL9400

A8-7200P vs Core 2 Duo SL9400 Performance Spectrum

A8-7200P

4 / 4

2,158

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo SL9400

2 / 2

2,144

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7200P vs Core 2 Duo SL9400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7200P vs Core 2 Duo SL9400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7200P

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 6W, a 2W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core 2 Duo SL9400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core 2 Duo SL9400

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7200P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,144 vs 2,158).
❌Launch MSRP is still $284 MSRP, while A8-7200P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 6W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7200P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7200P better than Core 2 Duo SL9400?

Yes. A8-7200P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7200P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7200P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7200P is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A8-7200P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $284 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo SL9400 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7200P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7200P vs Core 2 Duo SL9400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7200P

The A8-7200P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $90.

Core 2 Duo SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $284.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7200P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SL9400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-7200P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A8-7200P versus 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 — a 55.8% clock advantage for the A8-7200P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A8-7200P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7200P scores 2,158 against the Core 2 Duo SL9400's 2,144 — a 0.7% lead for the A8-7200P.

Feature	A8-7200P	Core 2 Duo SL9400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+77%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+29%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4096 kB	6 MB+50%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,158	2,144

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7200P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SL9400 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-7200P versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SL9400 — the A8-7200P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7200P supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A8-7200P) and GS45,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo SL9400).

Feature	A8-7200P	Core 2 Duo SL9400
Socket	FP3	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1866+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (A8-7200P) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo SL9400). The A8-7200P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo SL9400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SL9400 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-7200P rivals Core i3-4100M.