A8-7200P vs Core i5-4250U

A8-7200P vs Core i5-4250U Performance Spectrum

A8-7200P

4 / 4

2,158

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4250U

2 / 4

2,144

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7200P vs Core i5-4250U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7200P vs Core i5-4250U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7200P

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4250U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,144 vs 2,158).
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7200P better than Core i5-4250U?

Yes. A8-7200P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7200P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7200P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7200P still makes the most sense overall. A8-7200P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7200P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7200P vs Core i5-4250U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7200P

The A8-7200P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-4250U

The Core i5-4250U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $430.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7200P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4250U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7200P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A8-7200P versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4250U — a 23.7% clock advantage for the A8-7200P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A8-7200P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4250U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7200P scores 2,158 against the Core i5-4250U's 2,144 — a 0.7% lead for the A8-7200P.

Feature	A8-7200P	Core i5-4250U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+27%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,158	2,144
Geekbench 6 Single	—	770
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7200P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4250U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-7200P versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4250U — the A8-7200P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-7200P) vs 12 (Core i5-4250U) — the A8-7200P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A8-7200P) and Haswell-ULT (Core i5-4250U).

Feature	A8-7200P	Core i5-4250U
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7200P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4250U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A8-7200P) and HD Graphics 5000 (Core i5-4250U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4250U targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-7200P rivals Core i3-4100M; Core i5-4250U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.