A8 Pro-7150B vs Atom 330

A8 Pro-7150B vs Atom 330 Performance Spectrum

A8 Pro-7150B

4 / 4

1,541

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom 330

2 / 4

1,530

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Atom 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Atom 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8 Pro-7150B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 8W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Atom 330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Atom 330

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 246.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 10.3 PassMark/$ ($43 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8 Pro-7150B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,530 vs 1,541).
❌100% higher power demand at 8W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8 Pro-7150B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8 Pro-7150B better than Atom 330?

Yes. A8 Pro-7150B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8 Pro-7150B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8 Pro-7150B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8 Pro-7150B is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A8 Pro-7150B comes in 248.8% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $43 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom 330 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8 Pro-7150B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Atom 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 Pro-7150B

The A8 Pro-7150B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,541 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom 330

The Atom 330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Diamondville (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $43.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8 Pro-7150B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom 330 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8 Pro-7150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A8 Pro-7150B versus 0.1 GHz on the Atom 330 — a 187.9% clock advantage for the A8 Pro-7150B (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A8 Pro-7150B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom 330 uses Diamondville (2008−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8 Pro-7150B scores 1,541 against the Atom 330's 1,530 — a 0.7% lead for the A8 Pro-7150B.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Atom 330
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+3100%	0.1 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+19%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+300%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Diamondville (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,541	1,530

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 Pro-7150B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom 330 uses PBGA437 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8 Pro-7150B versus DDR2-533 on the Atom 330 — the A8 Pro-7150B supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8 Pro-7150B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8 Pro-7150B) vs 1 (Atom 330). PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 Pro-7150B) vs 0 (Atom 330) — the A8 Pro-7150B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A8 Pro-7150B) and Intel BGA437 (Atom 330).

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Atom 330
Socket	FP3	PBGA437
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+200%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

The A8 Pro-7150B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Atom 330 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Atom 330
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R5	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8 Pro-7150B was priced at $150, while the Atom 330 came in at $43. On launch pricing ($150 vs $43), Atom 330 was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8 Pro-7150B delivers 10.3 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Atom 330 — making the Atom 330 the 110.4% better value option.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Atom 330
MSRP	$150	$43-71%
Performance per Dollar	10.3	35.6+246%
Release Date	2014	2008

Search A8 Pro-7150B on Amazon

Search Atom 330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.