A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron N4020

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron N4020 Performance Spectrum

A8 Pro-7150B

4 / 4

1,541

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4020

2 / 2

1,535

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron N4020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron N4020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8 Pro-7150B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Celeron N4020 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N4020 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron N4020

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8 Pro-7150B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,535 vs 1,541).
❌No integrated graphics, while A8 Pro-7150B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8 Pro-7150B better than Celeron N4020?

Yes. A8 Pro-7150B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8 Pro-7150B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8 Pro-7150B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8 Pro-7150B is the better buy right now. A8 Pro-7150B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron N4020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 Pro-7150B

The A8 Pro-7150B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,541 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N4020

The Celeron N4020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,535 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8 Pro-7150B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4020 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8 Pro-7150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A8 Pro-7150B versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the A8 Pro-7150B (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8 Pro-7150B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N4020 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8 Pro-7150B scores 1,541 against the Celeron N4020's 1,535 — a 0.4% lead for the A8 Pro-7150B.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Celeron N4020
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+73%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB	4 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
PassMark	1,541	1,535

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 Pro-7150B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4020 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.