A8 Pro-7150B
VS
Celeron J4005

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron J4005

AMD

A8 Pro-7150B

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron J4005

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8 Pro-7150B is positioned at rank 1073 and the Celeron J4005 is on rank 417, so the Celeron J4005 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8 Pro-7150B

#1061
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2857%
#1062
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2815%
#1063
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2584%
#1064
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2573%
#1065
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2549%
#1067
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2462%
#1068
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2360%
#1069
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2356%
#1070
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2293%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
100%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
98%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4005

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6061%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5727%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4158%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1253%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
992%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
868%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
497%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
491%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
447%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
447%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
442%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
430%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
424%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
422%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
418%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
100%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
98%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
96%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#417
Celeron J4005
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
100%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
99%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
98%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
97%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4005 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8 Pro-7150BCeleron J4005
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8 Pro-7150B (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8 Pro-7150BCeleron J4005
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8 Pro-7150B and Celeron J4005

AMD

A8 Pro-7150B

The A8 Pro-7150B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,541 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron J4005

The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The A8 Pro-7150B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J4005 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8 Pro-7150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A8 Pro-7150B versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the A8 Pro-7150B (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A8 Pro-7150B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8 Pro-7150B scores 1,541 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J4005.

FeatureA8 Pro-7150BCeleron J4005
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+19%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB
4 MB (total)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark
1,541
1,543
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 Pro-7150B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8 Pro-7150B versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 — the Celeron J4005 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8 Pro-7150B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 Pro-7150B) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) — the A8 Pro-7150B offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A8 Pro-7150B) and SoC (Celeron J4005).

FeatureA8 Pro-7150BCeleron J4005
Socket
FP3
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+167%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A8 Pro-7150B) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 (A8 Pro-7150B) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.

FeatureA8 Pro-7150BCeleron J4005
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Level Desktop