A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron J4005

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron J4005 Performance Spectrum

A8 Pro-7150B

4 / 4

1,541

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron J4005

2 / 2

1,543

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron J4005 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron J4005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8 Pro-7150B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 10W, a 6W reduction.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,541 vs 1,543).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron J4005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron J4005

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌150% higher power demand at 10W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8 Pro-7150B better than Celeron J4005?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8 Pro-7150B is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4005 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4005 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8 Pro-7150B is the better buy right now. A8 Pro-7150B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron J4005 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4005 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron J4005 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 Pro-7150B

The A8 Pro-7150B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,541 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J4005

The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8 Pro-7150B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J4005 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8 Pro-7150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A8 Pro-7150B versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the A8 Pro-7150B (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A8 Pro-7150B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8 Pro-7150B scores 1,541 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J4005.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Celeron J4005
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+19%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB	4 MB (total)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark	1,541	1,543
Geekbench 6 Single	—	450
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 Pro-7150B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8 Pro-7150B versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 — the Celeron J4005 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8 Pro-7150B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 Pro-7150B) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) — the A8 Pro-7150B offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A8 Pro-7150B) and SoC (Celeron J4005).

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Celeron J4005
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A8 Pro-7150B) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 (A8 Pro-7150B) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Celeron J4005
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R5	Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Entry Level Desktop