
A8 Pro-7150B

Core i5-12400F
A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8 Pro-7150B
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $24 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- β Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,541 vs 19,532).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on FP3, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +439.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 992.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 10.3 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP3 and older memory support.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8 Pro-7150B.
Trade-offs
- β16% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- β1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A8 Pro-7150B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than A8 Pro-7150B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 Pro-7150B
The A8 Pro-7150B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,541 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The A8 Pro-7150B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A8 Pro-7150B versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F β a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8 Pro-7150B uses the Kaveri (2014β2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A8 Pro-7150B scores 1,541 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 β a 170.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | A8 Pro-7150B | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | β | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+220% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014β2015) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 1,541 | 19,532+1167% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The A8 Pro-7150B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8 Pro-7150B versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F β the Core i5-12400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 Pro-7150B) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) β the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A8 Pro-7150B) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | A8 Pro-7150B | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (A8 Pro-7150B) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A8 Pro-7150B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A8 Pro-7150B | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R5 | β |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A8 Pro-7150B was priced at $150, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($150 vs $174), A8 Pro-7150B was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8 Pro-7150B delivers 10.3 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F β making the Core i5-12400F the 166.5% better value option.
| Feature | A8 Pro-7150B | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-14% | $174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 112.3+990% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















