A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-4210Y

A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-4210Y Performance Spectrum

A8 Pro-7150B

4 / 4

1,541

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4210Y

2 / 4

1,530

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-4210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-4210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8 Pro-7150B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-4210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4210Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8 Pro-7150B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,530 vs 1,541).
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8 Pro-7150B better than Core i5-4210Y?

Yes. A8 Pro-7150B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8 Pro-7150B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8 Pro-7150B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8 Pro-7150B is the better buy right now. A8 Pro-7150B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8 Pro-7150B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8 Pro-7150B vs Core i5-4210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8 Pro-7150B

The A8 Pro-7150B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,541 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4210Y

The Core i5-4210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8 Pro-7150B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4210Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8 Pro-7150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A8 Pro-7150B versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4210Y — a 51% clock advantage for the A8 Pro-7150B (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A8 Pro-7150B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4210Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8 Pro-7150B scores 1,541 against the Core i5-4210Y's 1,530 — a 0.7% lead for the A8 Pro-7150B.

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Core i5-4210Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+68%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+27%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,541	1,530
Geekbench 6 Single	—	580

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8 Pro-7150B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4210Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8 Pro-7150B) vs 12 (Core i5-4210Y) — the A8 Pro-7150B offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A8 Pro-7150B) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210Y).

Feature	A8 Pro-7150B	Core i5-4210Y
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A8 Pro-7150B) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210Y). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 (A8 Pro-7150B) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210Y rivals A4-6210.