A9-9425
Core i3-530
A9-9425 vs Core i3-530 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A9-9425 vs Core i3-530 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A9-9425 vs Core i3-530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A9-9425
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 73W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), while Core i3-530 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 13.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $113 MSRP).
Core i3-530
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($113 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($113 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,516 vs 1,518).
- ❌386.7% higher power demand at 73W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A9-9425 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A9-9425 better than Core i3-530?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A9-9425 vs Core i3-530 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A9-9425
The A9-9425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,518 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i3-530
The Core i3-530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,516 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The A9-9425 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-530's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A9-9425 versus 0.93 GHz on the Core i3-530 — a 119.7% clock advantage for the A9-9425 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The A9-9425 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-530 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9425 scores 1,518 against the Core i3-530's 1,516 — a 0.1% lead for the A9-9425. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9425 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-530.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+298% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+6% | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,518 | 1,516 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 422 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 724 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A9-9425 uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-530 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT4 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A9-9425) / not specified (Core i3-530). The A9-9425 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)), while the Core i3-530 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9425 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A9-9425 rivals Pentium N4200.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A9-9425 was priced at $150, while the Core i3-530 came in at $113. On launch pricing ($150 vs $113), Core i3-530 was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9425 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 13.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-530 — making the Core i3-530 the 28% better value option.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $113-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | 13.4+33% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A9-9425 and Core i3-530
