A9-9425
VS
Xeon X5270

A9-9425 vs Xeon X5270

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A9-9425 is positioned at rank 1078 and the Xeon X5270 is on rank 928, so the Xeon X5270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A9-9425

#1066
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2899%
#1067
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2857%
#1068
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2623%
#1069
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2611%
#1070
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2587%
#1072
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2498%
#1073
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2395%
#1074
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2391%
#1075
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2327%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
100%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
98%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
95%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
94%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5270

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
27273%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5149%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4575%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3534%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
98%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
98%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
97%
#524
Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $36
96%
#524
Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP: $6619|Avg: $185
96%
#524
Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $100
96%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
95%
#928
Xeon X5270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#931
Xeon E5-2660 v2
MSRP: $1393|Avg: $129
98%
#933
Xeon Silver 4112
MSRP: $885|Avg: $67
97%
#938
Xeon E5649
MSRP: $774|Avg: N/A
96%
#939
Xeon E3-1220L v3
MSRP: $193|Avg: $30
96%
#940
Xeon E5-2670 v2
MSRP: $1556|Avg: $189
96%
#941
Xeon E5-2637 v3
MSRP: $996|Avg: $75
96%
#943
Xeon E5-1680 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $150
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A9-9425 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA9-9425Xeon X5270
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5270 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA9-9425Xeon X5270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A9-9425 and Xeon X5270

AMD

A9-9425

The A9-9425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,518 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5270

The Xeon X5270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,524 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The A9-9425 is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the A9-9425 scores 1,518 against the Xeon X5270's 1,524 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X5270. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9425 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5270.

FeatureA9-9425Xeon X5270
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,518
1,524
Geekbench 6 Single
422
Geekbench 6 Multi
724
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9425 uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5270 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA9-9425Xeon X5270
Socket
FT4
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A9-9425) / not specified (Xeon X5270). The A9-9425 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)), while the Xeon X5270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9425 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A9-9425 rivals Pentium N4200.

FeatureA9-9425Xeon X5270
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop