Athlon 64 2000+
Athlon XP 2400+
Athlon 64 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2400+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2400+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2400+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 2000+
2008Why buy it
- ✅+8.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $93 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 108.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 1.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 68W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Athlon XP 2400+
2002Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (305 vs 330).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌750% higher power demand at 68W vs 8W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 2000+ better than Athlon XP 2400+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2400+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 2000+
The Athlon 64 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon XP 2400+
The Athlon XP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon XP 2400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Athlon 64 2000+ versus 2 GHz on the Athlon XP 2400+ — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2400+. The Athlon 64 2000+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon XP 2400+ uses Thorton (2001−2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2000+ scores 330 against the Athlon XP 2400+'s 305 — a 7.9% lead for the Athlon 64 2000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2000+ | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-50% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Lima (2008−2009) | Thorton (2001−2003) |
| PassMark | 330+8% | 305 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 2000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2400+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-400 on the Athlon 64 2000+ versus DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2400+ — the Athlon 64 2000+ supports -250.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 2000+) vs 1 (Athlon XP 2400+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 2000+) vs 0 (Athlon XP 2400+) — the Athlon 64 2000+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2000+) and AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2400+).
| Feature | Athlon 64 2000+ | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-400 | DDR-266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 2000+ was priced at $100, while the Athlon XP 2400+ came in at $193. On launch pricing ($100 vs $193), Athlon 64 2000+ was $93 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 2000+ delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 1.6 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 2400+ — making the Athlon 64 2000+ the 70.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2000+ | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-48% | $193 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3+106% | 1.6 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2002 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon XP 2400+
