Athlon 64 2000+
VS
Atom D410

Athlon 64 2000+ vs Atom D410

AMD

Athlon 64 2000+

1 Cores1 Thrd8 WWMax: 1 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Atom D410

1 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 2000+ is positioned at rank 1088 and the Atom D410 is on rank 271, so the Atom D410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
94459%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
89255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64806%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19523%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13528%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7748%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7647%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6963%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6962%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6885%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6699%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6605%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6578%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6519%
#1086
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
100%
#1087
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
100%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
99%
#1090
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1091
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
98%
#1092
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
94%
#1093
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
92%
#1094
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
86%
#1095
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1096
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
72%
#1097
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1098
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1099
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1100
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
64%
#1101
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D410

#258
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
425%
#259
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#260
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#261
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#262
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
379%
#264
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
366%
#265
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
351%
#266
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#267
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
341%
#271
Atom D410
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#276
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Atom D410 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon 64 2000+ in both compute-intensive tasks (4.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 2000+Atom D410
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 2000+Atom D410
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 2000+ and Atom D410

AMD

Athlon 64 2000+

The Athlon 64 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom D410

The Atom D410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $636.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 2000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom D410's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Athlon 64 2000+ versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom D410 — a 50.2% clock advantage for the Atom D410. The Athlon 64 2000+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom D410 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2000+ scores 330 against the Atom D410's 345 — a 4.4% lead for the Atom D410. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 2000+Atom D410
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
1.67 GHz+67%
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Lima (2008−2009)
Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark
330
345+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom D410 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-400 memory speed. The Athlon 64 2000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 2000+) vs 1 (Atom D410). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 2000+) vs 0 (Atom D410) — the Athlon 64 2000+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2000+) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D410).

FeatureAthlon 64 2000+Atom D410
Socket
AM2
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-400
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom D410 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 2000+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon 64 2000+Atom D410
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150