Athlon 64 2000+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

Athlon 64 2000+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2000+

1 / 1

330

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

1 / 2

345

+4.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2000+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 2000+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2000+

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 60W, a 52W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (330 vs 345).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌650% higher power demand at 60W vs 8W.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 better than Athlon 64 2000+?

Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 2000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 2000+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 2000+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 2000+

The Athlon 64 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $149.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 2000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Athlon 64 2000+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 — a 82.4% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. The Athlon 64 2000+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2000+ scores 330 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 345 — a 4.4% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 2000+	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.4 GHz+140%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Lima (2008−2009)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	330	345+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.